| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
generated_class_user due to Java8 issues.
Java8's annotation processor as embedded within javac does not allow
referencing not-yet existing generated classes in a class source code
which will produce these generated classes via the annotation process.
Example:
+++
import com.jogamp.gluegen.structgen.CStruct;
public class Lala {
@CStruct(name="RenderingConfig", header="TestStruct01.h")
public RenderingConfig config;
}
+++
Above example illustrates that the type 'RenderingConfig'
does not exist at time of processing the annotation.
The type will be created via the annotation process itself.
Even though we pass '-proc:only', i.e. skip java compilation,
Java8's annotation processing via javac fails in such case.
We see this as a bug within javac's annotation processing itself!
+++
This workaround splits the annotation process and using the class as
generated by the former.
To allow this to work, CStruct receives a new field 'jname'
allowing to enforce the java-name of the structure
using a dummy field type like boolean.
@CStruct(name="RenderingConfig", jname="RenderingConfig", header="TestStruct01.h")
public boolean dummy;
Further more CStruct can be annotated on the package, i.e. 'package-info.java',
avoiding the dependency problem altogether.
To support multiple header files and types,
'CStructs' has been introduced using an array of 'CStruct'.
@CStructs({@CStruct(name="RenderingConfig", header="TestStruct01.h"), @CStruct(name="Pixel", header="TestStruct02.h")})
package com.jogamp.gluegen.test.junit.structgen;
Tests:
- Build w/ Java7 and Java8
- Validated 'major version 50' (Java 6) class files (OK)
|
