| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
proper filenames for screenshots)
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Consider applying it in default chooser?
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
modify values if text and/or font differs, skipping markShapeDirty() saves performance.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
undesired (Graph VBAA + MSAA); Add NonFSAAGLCapabilitiesChooser
Notable: On RaspiPi4b w/ Mesa3D's Broadcom/VC driver,
the chosen capabilities is a multisamnple one even though not requested.
This causes
- extra performance overhead
- doubled AA: 1st our VBAA, then the FSAA (multisample) -> loss of sharpness
Simply dropping the undersired FSAA helps and ups performance
on the Raspi board (22 -> 35 fps).
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
comparing the VisualID first; Added VisualIDHolder.isVisualIDSupported(VIDType)
We cannot accept 2 capabilities with different VisualID but same attributes otherwise accepted as equal,
since the underlying windowing system uniquely identifies them via their VisualID.
Such comparison is used in certail GLAutoDrawable implementations like AWT GLCanvas
to determine a configuration change etc.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
region, i.e. have a proper resolution independent layout.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
fit on small displays
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
PC 'regioned' perf enhanced a little bit, for some reason the RPI performance went down a tiny bit (fluctuations?).
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
+ 3.4ms (draw), PC 2.97ms (Region) + 0.36ms (draw) (GOOD)
Performance update from commit 607eb99b9cad227dd7be6d149c6b6cf57d060c35
(Note: There I mentioned the total duration for 20 frames, not per frame)
A Performance @ 2.4.0 with 119,787 vertices:
- doc/curve/tests/perf00/rpi4_old.log
- RaspiPi4 57.20ms (Region) + 23.4ms (draw)
B Performance @ commit 607eb99b9cad227dd7be6d149c6b6cf57d060c35 with 81,092 vertices:
- doc/curve/tests/perf01/rpi4_7.log + doc/curve/tests/perf01/pc_7.log
- RaspiPi4 11.76ms (Region) + 3.5ms (draw), PC 3.4ms (Region) + 0.35ms (draw)
C Now with 81,092 vertices (and a slight bigger buffer due to 'count' pre-size):
- doc/curve/tests/perf02/rpi4_10.log + doc/curve/tests/perf02/pc_10.log
- RaspiPi4 10.25ms (Region) + 3.4ms (draw), PC 2.97ms (Region) + 0.36ms (draw)
Hence we enhanced performance from A -> C reasonably.
Most important is that neither 'Flight Recorder' not 'Visual VM' could identify
Region.addOutlineShape()'s triangulation nor vertices compounding to be
significant throttle.
After further triangulation bugfixes (delauny tesselation),
we might analyze performance of this method further.
Enhancements of VBO GLArrayData data management
where Region.addOutlineShape() finally we pushes the data into the VBO
helped to remove certain overhead.
Mostly the buffer-size enhancements including API-hooks to count the required vertices & indices
to issue Region.setBufferCapacity() helped to ease the GC.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
selected commits)
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
TextRegionUtil.countStringRegion() allowing to use Region.setBufferCapacity()
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
than enough
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
early if not needed (track capacity); Align all VBORegion* buffer init/set/grow impl.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
addOutlineShape1() (slow perf+debug), rename growBufferSize() -> growBuffer()
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
buffer data-type to directly put[34][sif](..) skipping GLArrayDataClient/Buffers buffer-growth and validations
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
used for getElemCount() instead of 0==position, ... (API change)
API Change
- sealed() moved up from GLArrayDataEditable -> GLArrayData
- GLArrayDataWrapper is sealed by default
- getSizeInBytes() -> getByteCount()
- Semantics of getElemCount() and getByteCount()
- Correctly use sealed() to switch from position to limit - instead of 0==position
Aligned method names:
- getElemCount()
- elemPosition()
- remainingElems()
- getElemCapacity()
to corresponding byte counts:
- getByteCount()
- bytePosition()
- remainingBytes()
- getByteCapacity()
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
but recommended)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Also tested w/ alternative JVM (Azul) .. works well, no big difference (but slower startup time, but might be OpenJDK 17->19 related as well).
Printing usual system infos to make the test record useful.
Cmdline is: com.jogamp.opengl.test.junit.graph.PerfTextRendererNEWT00 -es2 -Nperf -long_text -loop 40
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
FPSCounterImpl accuracy by maintaining timestamps in [ns]
Idea: Perhaps we want to use [ns] for FPSCounter's method types by now?
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
performance-hit measuring performance.
This was mostly notable on a Raspberry-Pi 4 arm64, where perfromance degragated around 3x using high-freq counter.
Using our well determined Clock.currentNanos() removes this overhead,
back to 'easy measuring' and having a well defined 'currentNanos()' since module start.
TestTextRendererNEWT00 can enable Region and Font perf-counter w/ '-perf',
w/o it only uses its own counter and hence reduce the high-freq burden (64% perf win on raspi4).
+++
Below numbers show that Region.addOutlineShape() perhaps needs a little performance work
to allow long text to be processed in 'real time' on embedded platform.
Hower, usually we cache the Region for long text and can have at least one liner
to be renderer within 60fps fast, i.e. Region produced in ~26ms for a 81 char line
instead of ~130ms for 664 chars.
+++
Raspberry Pi 4b, OpenJDK17, Debian 11:
Using current medium sized text_1 w/ 664 chars, w/o '-perf'
and after having passed 40 frames, we have following durations:
- process the OutlineShape -> Region: 129ms (text)
- Render the Region: 53ms
Startup Times:
- loading GlueGen - loading test 0 [ms]
- loading GlueGen - start test 1,910 [ms]
- loading test - start test 1,910 [ms]
- loading test - gl 2,631 [ms]
- loading test - graph 2,636 [ms]
- loading test - txt 2,844 [ms]
- loading test - draw 3,062 [ms]
Perf ..
1 / 1: Perf Launch: Total: graph 5, txt 207, draw 218, txt+draw 425 [ms]
1 / 1: Perf Launch: PerLoop: graph 5,505,740, txt 207,530,736, draw 218,393,680, txt+draw 425,924,416 [ns]
20 / 20: Perf Frame20: Total: graph 16, txt 376, draw 281, txt+draw 657 [ms]
20 / 20: Perf Frame20: PerLoop: graph 807,055, txt 18,820,824, draw 14,075,146, txt+draw 32,895,970 [ns]
20 / 40: Perf Frame40: Total: graph 3, txt 129, draw 53, txt+draw 182 [ms]
20 / 40: Perf Frame40: PerLoop: graph 176,670, txt 6,451,330, draw 2,658,217, txt+draw 9,109,547 [ns]
+++
On a modern desktop (~2y old), GNU/Linux Debian 11, AMD GPU on Mesa3D:
Using current medium sized text_1 w/ 664 chars, w/o '-perf'
and after having passed 40 frames, we have following durations:
- process the OutlineShape -> Region: 42ms (text)
- Render the Region: 5ms
Startup Times:
- loading GlueGen - loading test 0 [ms]
- loading GlueGen - start test 310 [ms]
- loading test - start test 309 [ms]
- loading test - gl 459 [ms]
- loading test - graph 460 [ms]
- loading test - txt 490 [ms]
- loading test - draw 506 [ms]
Perf ..
1 / 1: Perf Launch: Total: graph 1, txt 29, draw 15, txt+draw 45 [ms]
1 / 1: Perf Launch: PerLoop: graph 1,191,096, txt 29,868,436, draw 15,519,445, txt+draw 45,387,881 [ns]
20 / 20: Perf Frame20: Total: graph 240, txt 68, draw 21, txt+draw 89 [ms]
20 / 20: Perf Frame20: PerLoop: graph 12,045,651, txt 3,415,402, draw 1,069,348, txt+draw 4,484,750 [ns]
20 / 40: Perf Frame40: Total: graph 283, txt 42, draw 5, txt+draw 47 [ms]
20 / 40: Perf Frame40: PerLoop: graph 14,152,395, txt 2,116,114, draw 265,292, txt+draw 2,381,406 [ns]
|
|
|
|
| |
Platform.currentTimeMillis()
|
|
|
|
| |
Clock.getMonotonicTime() ...
|
|
|
|
| |
eglSwapBuffers(..) already performs this task (TODO: More Tests!)
|
|
|
|
| |
PC and raspi-aarch64 ..
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
indices growBufferSize(); Add GLRegion.create(..) w/ initial vertices/indices count; Up default[VI]Count;
Following heuristcs were found, hence we might want to calculate these for each font (TODO):
/**
* Heuristics with TestTextRendererNEWT00 text_1 + text_2 = 1334 chars
* - FreeSans ~ vertices 64/char, indices 33/char
* - Ubuntu Light ~ vertices 100/char, indices 50/char
* - FreeSerif ~ vertices 115/char, indices 61/char
*
* Now let's assume a minimum of 10 chars will be rendered
*/
|
|
|
|
| |
Also add commented-out FlightRecording, not yet usefull - lacking depth for our methods.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
variants for flexibility/performance
Notable: The array-put is slower than small range single-puts, e.g. put3i(..).
Uses GlueGen's Buffers change commit 69b748925038b7d44fa6318536642b426e3d3e38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
newt.ws.mmwidth and newt.ws.mmheight property
This is essential on bare-metal devices where the screen DRM/GBM driver does not provide the screen-size (in mm).
Otherwise we would have resolution/(size_mm=0) infinity density and none of our graph font demos would work,
as we compute pixel-em-size based using dpi and pixel-pt-size.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
createDummyDrawable(..)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
createOffscreenDrawable() prefer createSurfacelessImpl() over createDummySurfaceImpl() to reduce resources (no actual window)
This enhances the 'dummy drawable' use-case implementation, i.e. for shared context.
|
|
|
|
| |
AbstractGraphicsDevice to allow EGLDrawableFactory to use the original device's native-dislay-ID for sharing resources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pass orig AbstractGraphicsDevice to allow EGLDrawableFactory to use the original device's native-dislay-ID for sharing resources.
EGLDrawableFactory to use the original device's native-dislay-ID for sharing resources, e.g. GLContext.
EGL 1.4 requires same native-display-ID of share-list context and newly created context!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
is not orig-owner
|
|
|
|
| |
streamWorker stop result (-> deadlock)
|
|
|
|
| |
variant
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dropping its usage (GLArrayDataWrapper validation)
Skip GLProfile based index, comps, type validation, might not be future proof.
|
|
|
|
| |
sponsorship.
|
| |
|