summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWade Walker <[email protected]>2014-03-08 16:17:36 -0600
committerWade Walker <[email protected]>2014-03-08 16:17:36 -0600
commit7a7f87a1fc7419f758ba9b134764ae544fd6d566 (patch)
treeb640a9e29883b46444d6f01334f8e8cacf1a8431 /test
parent7ab26044167c84fc6386cc179e8a8736d8978c91 (diff)
Fix crashes due to AMD driver bugs.
programBinariesTest() failure was due to AMD drivers crashing in clCreateKernelsInProgram() when the program is not built yet, instead of returning error code CL_INVALID_PROGRAM_EXECUTABLE as they should. lowLevelVectorAddTest() failure was apparently due to the AMD drivers writing past the end of a direct byte buffer in such a way that it made System.gc() crash when called during teardown (this crash didn't even dump stack). Making the buffer larger solved the problem.
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
-rw-r--r--test/com/jogamp/opencl/CLProgramTest.java32
-rw-r--r--test/com/jogamp/opencl/LowLevelBindingTest.java5
2 files changed, 24 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/test/com/jogamp/opencl/CLProgramTest.java b/test/com/jogamp/opencl/CLProgramTest.java
index 7fb7bc32..7a56a939 100644
--- a/test/com/jogamp/opencl/CLProgramTest.java
+++ b/test/com/jogamp/opencl/CLProgramTest.java
@@ -85,12 +85,16 @@ public class CLProgramTest extends UITestCase {
CLContext context = CLContext.create();
CLProgram program = context.createProgram(getClass().getResourceAsStream("testkernels.cl"));
- try{
- program.createCLKernels();
- fail("expected exception but got none :(");
- }catch(CLException ex) {
- out.println("got expected exception: "+ex.getCLErrorString());
- assertEquals(ex.errorcode, CL.CL_INVALID_PROGRAM_EXECUTABLE);
+ // only test kernel creation error on unbuilt program if we're not on AMD -- as of
+ // 3/8/2014, AMD drivers segfault on this instead of returning CL_INVALID_PROGRAM_EXECUTABLE
+ if(!context.getPlatform().isVendorAMD()) {
+ try{
+ program.createCLKernels();
+ fail("expected exception but got none :(");
+ }catch(CLException ex) {
+ out.println("got expected exception: "+ex.getCLErrorString());
+ assertEquals(ex.errorcode, CL.CL_INVALID_PROGRAM_EXECUTABLE);
+ }
}
out.println(program.getBuildStatus());
@@ -127,7 +131,7 @@ public class CLProgramTest extends UITestCase {
CLProgram program = context.createProgram(getClass().getResourceAsStream("testkernels.cl"))
.build(ENABLE_MAD, WARNINGS_ARE_ERRORS);
- // optain binaries
+ // obtain binaries
Map<CLDevice, byte[]> binaries = program.getBinaries();
assertFalse(binaries.isEmpty());
@@ -177,11 +181,15 @@ public class CLProgramTest extends UITestCase {
assertNotNull(program.getSource());
assertEquals(program.getSource().length(), 0);
- try{
- Map<String, CLKernel> kernels = program.createCLKernels();
- fail("expected an exception from createCLKernels but got: "+kernels);
- }catch(CLException ex) {
- // expected, not build yet
+ // only test kernel creation error on unbuilt program if we're not on AMD -- as of
+ // 3/8/2014, AMD drivers segfault on this instead of returning CL_INVALID_PROGRAM_EXECUTABLE
+ if(!context.getPlatform().isVendorAMD()) {
+ try{
+ Map<String, CLKernel> kernels = program.createCLKernels();
+ fail("expected an exception from createCLKernels but got: "+kernels);
+ }catch(CLException ex) {
+ // expected, not built yet
+ }
}
out.println(program.getBuildStatus());
diff --git a/test/com/jogamp/opencl/LowLevelBindingTest.java b/test/com/jogamp/opencl/LowLevelBindingTest.java
index 90027e13..52d74882 100644
--- a/test/com/jogamp/opencl/LowLevelBindingTest.java
+++ b/test/com/jogamp/opencl/LowLevelBindingTest.java
@@ -256,7 +256,10 @@ public class LowLevelBindingTest extends UITestCase {
int deviceCount = (int) (longBuffer.get(0) / (is32Bit() ? 4 : 8));
out.println("context created with " + deviceCount + " devices");
- ByteBuffer bb = newDirectByteBuffer(4096);
+ // Was originally 4096, but had to make this bigger or it would crash in UITestCase.oneTimeTearDown(){ System.gc() }
+ // without even dumping a stack when using AMD drivers. Presumably the drivers would write past the end
+ // of the block and mess up GC info somehow.
+ ByteBuffer bb = newDirectByteBuffer(8192);
ret = cl.clGetContextInfo(context, CL.CL_CONTEXT_DEVICES, bb.capacity(), bb, null);
checkError("on clGetContextInfo", ret);